5 Situations when asynchronous video meetings are more effective than live video meetings

5 Situations when asynchronous video meetings are more effective than live video meetings

Video meetings are a great way to connect with team members working remotely, but they may not be the right option every time. Meeting overload is a real problem, and sometimes it’s best to ditch the live video meeting in favor of an asynchronous one. Here are five situations when sending a recorded video message is more effective than having a live video meeting.

Related reading: 7 Proven tips for managing remote employees

1. When teams are working remotely or on the go

If your team is working from different locations that span multiple time zones or some members are traveling, it can be difficult to find a time that works for everyone to meet. In this case, it may be more effective to host an asynchronous video meeting. This way, team members can watch the meeting recording at a time that works for them, and they can also pause and rewind the video if they need to take notes or want to review something.

2. When you need feedback from a large number of people

Live video meetings can be great for getting immediate feedback from a small team. But if you need to gather feedback from a large number of people, an asynchronous video meeting lets you do so more efficiently. It saves time and ensures that everyone gets to provide their own input.

Also, while some people prefer reacting to questions and ideas spontaneously, others find it helpful to have time to think about their responses. Asynchronous video meetings allow people to have their say without putting them on the spot. Let your team know in advance when you’ll be sending the recording, and give them time to watch it and provide their feedback.

3. When preparing participants to have a more informed discussion

If you want to ensure that everyone is on the same page before a live video meeting, consider sending a recorded video message first. This way, you can provide all the necessary information upfront, and participants can take the time to process it and come prepared with questions or comments. This is especially helpful if you’re discussing a complex topic or sensitive issue.

4. When providing meeting recaps and status updates

A live video meeting may not be necessary if you’re simply sharing information that doesn’t need to be discussed in depth. This could include meeting recaps, status updates, or announcements. You can also provide more context in an asynchronous video meeting by including links, attachments, or even a short presentation. Not only will video recaps and updates be less disruptive to team members’ schedules, but they’ll also be more convenient for people who want to review or reference the information later on.

5. When conducting all-hands meetings

All-hands meetings are typically held to update everyone on the company’s progress, share important news, or recognize employees for their achievements. While live video meetings can be effective for this purpose, they can also be quite disruptive, especially if team members are working on deadlines or are located in different time zones. What’s more, not everyone may need to watch the entire meeting. An asynchronous video meeting can be just as informative as a live one, and it will allow employees to watch the recording at a time that is convenient for them. Plus, they can always fast-forward through parts that are not relevant to them.

Asynchronous video meetings have a number of advantages over live video meetings, and they can be more effective in certain situations. So the next time you’re planning a video call, consider whether an asynchronous meeting would get the job done more or just as effectively.

Related reading: 7 Key tech your hybrid workers need

Don’t know which tools to use for asynchronous video meetings? Get in touch with Kortek Solutions today. Our team of experts can help you find the right technologies and solutions for your specific business needs and budget.